Monday, March 14, 2011

Making Money Without


It’s nearing two weeks since unions and their cohorts on the Left have thrown a nationwide fit over Scott Walker’s solution to what is ailing Wisconsin. Unions and Democrats have made Wisconsin their cause célèbre by deploying OFA astroturf, the big talking heads, as well as recruiting just about every known Grateful Dead concert attendee on their mailing lists into Wisconsin. Meanwhile, Democratic state senators (now humorously known as fleebaggers) comically continue to hold the state hostage over an issue of union power, politics and money—nothing more and nothing less.



Despite unions’ long hatred of Scott Walker, the new governor is moving to address both the symptoms of the disease and the disease itself—the public-sector union scheme that has molested Wisconsin’s taxpayers and their children by gaming the system. Unions like Wisconsin’s teachers’ union [WEAC] (which was Wisconsin’s biggest-spending lobby in 2009) have been extraordinarily adept at fixing the system through spending millions to elect politicians who, in turn, reward the unions at the expense of the taxpayers.


Now, in response to Walker’s proposals, the Left has gone overboard in their attempt to protect their stranglehold on Wisconsin taxpayers. Even though unions have made clear that their fight is not about their wages or benefits (they’ve offered concessions), they’ve made the fight all about their “right to be unionized” and the fictitious right to “collective bargaining”—which makes their cause even more despotic.


In making Madison into something reminiscent of the spectacle of the 1960s, unions, Democrats and their liberal cohorts are attempting to make the Wisconsin union battle into a civil rights battle, when it is not.  In fact, the Wisconsin fight, when compared to private-sector negotiations is about: 1) the Scope of Bargaining, 2) Union “Income” Security [Right-to-Work vs. Forced Dues], 3) whether Wisconsin should be the unions’ dues collection agency [payroll deduction of dues], and 4) whether public-sector unions should be ‘recertified’ by holding elections every year.



Contrary to the Left’s hyperbole, Scott Walker’s proposals do nothing to eliminate public-sector workers’ right to association, assemblage, or to petition their government. Even pretending that it is a “rights” issue is a mistake. There is nothing in the U.S. Constitution that requires a government to engage in a back and forth negotiation with a collective of workers. In a poignant piece entitled There is No Right to Collective Bargaining, Public Service Research Foundation President David Denholm summarizes the problem with the unions’ argument, stating:


A law granting public-sector unions monopoly bargaining privileges gives a union, a special interest group, two bites at the apple. First, it uses its political clout to elect public officials. Then it negotiates with the very same officials.


When you consider that between 70 and 80 percent of all local government expenditures are personnel costs, you begin to get an idea of the magnitude of the power such laws give unions.


Not only is there no right to collective bargaining in public employment, it is wrong. Collective bargaining distorts and corrupts democratic government.


Collective bargaining is a process for employer-employee relations that was designed for the private sector. This process served as the model for the development of public-sector collective bargaining without taking into account the fundamental differences between the two sectors.


As Mississippi Governor Haley Barbour explains:


“When they have collective bargaining in Wisconsin, on one side of the table there’s state employee unions or the local employee unions. On the other side of the table are politicians that they paid for the election of those politicians,” Barbour said. “Now, who represents the taxpayers in that negotiation? Well, actually, nobody.”


Even Newsweek’s Evan Thomas noted on Sunday [via Newsbusters]:


The Democrats really depend on these public employee unions in a lot of states for their support and for their political muscle, and public employee unions got a problem here. I want to distinguish between unions and public employee unions. Unions obviously are critical, but in the public sector, public employee unions have a pretty easy time getting a lot of benefits because nobody’s really pushing back all that hard.


Admittedly, Walker’s proposals are a threat to unions in several ways. As Walker’s proposals determine:



  1. The extent of what unions will be allowed to bargain about. Walker’s proposal limits bargaining to wages only, effectively eliminating the WEA Trust monopoly which gets its money from local school boards and runs it through a union-run insurance company.

  2. Whether unions can have workers fired for not paying union dues. According to its most recent financial record on file, WEAC (the teachers’ union) raked in over $25 million in 2009. Walker’s proposal makes paying union dues voluntary, as opposed to mandatory. This goes to the lifeblood of any union. If, for example, 20% of those teachers who are currently required to pay union dues as a condition of employment opt out, WEAC could lose up to $5 million a year in revenue. [It is noteworthy that, in the private-sector, the SEIU will be conducting its second strike at a Pennsylvania medical center over the issue of mandatory dues.]

  3. Whether the state will continue being the unions’ dues collector. Walker’s proposal eliminates’ the employers’ payroll deduction of union dues. Again, while it is commonplace for unions to negotiate payroll deduction, there is nothing anywhere (in private or public sector law) that states that it is an employers’ duty to be a union’s collection agency.

  4. Whether the unions will have to ‘re-certify’ every year to maintain representational status. Of all of Walker’s proposals, this seems to be one that could be considered a ‘throw away’ item in negotiations. If Walker’s other proposals get enacted, and union-represented employees feel that the union is worthless, they can initiate an election themselves every calendar under existing law [see Section 111.83(5)[h]] .


Given the ability of the unions and their co-conspirators on the Left to hijack the issue in Wisconsin over these last two weeks, there appears no way for a “win-win” compromise to be worked out. One side or the other will win. Either the unions and the Left, or taxpayers will prevail.


If the Left wins, all chances of reforming public-sector unions will be tossed aside by weak-kneed Republicans who will then be held hostage by temper-tantrum throwing Democrats (see Indiana for example). In addition, the Left has already painted the entire Republicans party with bulls eyes and has for years. Therefore, there is no reason for GOP governors like Scott Walker, Chris Christie and John Kasich to back down, which puts the Left in an untenable situation as well.


In the meantime, the disciples of Saul Alinsky will continue their prattle, attempting to convince America that the Battle of Wisconsin is something more than a fight over union power, politics and money…even though it’s not.


_________________


“I bring reason to your ears, and, in language as plain as ABC, hold up truth to your eyes.” Thomas Paine, December 23, 1776


X-posted.





There are two NPR executives in the video, identified as Schiller and Director of Institutional Giving Betsy Liley. Neither executive works in NPR's news division. They are shown having lunch with potential NPR donors, who were really working for O'Keefe undercover. In the video, they pose as representatives of a Muslim organization that is considering making a $5 million donation to NPR.


Schiller, who announced last week that he is leaving NPR, makes repeated criticisms against the Tea Party, saying the group is racist.


"Tea Party people" aren't "just Islamaphobic, but really xenophobic," Schiller says. "I mean basically they are, they believe in sort of white, middle-America gun-toting. I mean, it's scary. They're seriously racist, racist people."


He goes on to say, "The Tea Party is fanatically involved in people's personal lives and very fundamental Christian. I wouldn't even call it Christian. It's this weird evangelical kind of move."


In the video, Schiller says that NPR, which is partially funded by government money, would be "better off without federal funding."


"The problem is that if we lost it now, a lot of stations would go dark," Schiller said.


Schiller's remarks come only one day after NPR President and CEO Vivian Schiller (who is unrelated to Ron Schiller) told an audience at the National Press Club that federal funding for NPR was essential.


"Government funding is critical because it allows taxpayers to leverage a small investment into a very large one," she said, according to prepared remarks. "It is seed money. Station managers tell me that 10 percent plays a critical role in generating the other 90 percent that makes their broadcasts possible."


A movement to defund the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, which helps subsidize NPR along with the Public Broadcasting System, is making the rounds among some congressional Republicans, including House Majority Leader Eric Cantor, who released a statement Tuesday afternoon in response to reports of Ron Schiller's comments in the undercover video.


"As we continue to identify ways to cut spending and save valuable resources, this disturbing video makes clear that taxpayer dollars should no longer be appropriated to NPR," Cantor said.


"Not only have top public broadcasting executives finally admitted that they do not need taxpayer dollars to survive, it is also clear that without federal funds, public broadcasting stations self-admittedly would become eligible for more private dollars on top of the multi-million dollar donations these organizations already receive."


Tea Party representatives were also quick to decry Ron Schiller's remarks, using his suggestion that NPR would be better off without government money as an opportunity to call for defunding the organization.


"Mr. Schiller himself candidly admits in the video that NPR doesn't need federal funding, and welcomes the opportunity to slant their reporting without the oversight of the taxpayer," said Mark Meckler, national coordinator for Tea Party Patriots, in a statement. "At a time when the country is upside down by more than a trillion dollars, can we really afford to provide huge subsidies to entities that openly state that they don't need the money? Let's take his advice and pass legislation that would defund the clearly biased news organization that is out of touch with Americans across the country."


– CNN Political Producer Shannon Travis contributed to this report.


Updated 4:35 p.m.


MORE ON JAMES O'KEEFE


Fake pimp from ACORN videos tries to 'punk' CNN correspondent


ACORN workers caught on tape allegedly advising on prostitution


Right on the Edge: The new conservatives




Surface Encounters proudly ensures consumer satisfaction and price tag installing granite assurance. “I’m consistently skeptical going with new organizations, but your workers has crafted me a believer!” - Steve, Indianapolis

Surface Encounters is actually a fast-growing surface encounters service and, yet still they've stored pace with every one of the recent buyer referrals. “This organisation is probably the most reasonably priced, dependable and pleasant vendors from the whole state. I'd encourage them to any person.” - Mike R., South Bend

Numerous get the job done goes into creating attractive countertops from nature. The method involves laser measurement creative vein matching, precision diamond and water-jet cutting, edging and certified set up. A person won't be able to plainly simply call in their order for a custom countertop and have it within just every day or two. High-quality usually takes time.

Surface Encounters encourages many people to go to a showroom to understand far more about healthy stone countertops. Aside from the choice and fabrication method, another valuable piece of purchaser treatment is ensuring a person appreciates how you can treatment for their granite countertop to maintain it on the lookout new for decades to come.

Granite is known as a wonderful all-natural stone products that is a well known material employed for countertops and floor tiles in kitchens and bathrooms. Granite has surpassed marble in attractiveness due to the fact is it a lot more sturdy and less complicated to treatment for. Granite is unmatched by artificial items for its strength and sturdiness, tolerance to temperature adjustments and resistance to stains and scratches.

Granite is a normally formed stone that is certainly quarried from deep inside earth, harvested, lower, polished, sealed and set up in homes to add elegance, elegance and model. Since this is a purely natural solution, no two slabs are precisely alike. Granite is offered in numerous colours from your diverse minerals that are uncovered inside the rock. As it arrives from all over the world, various areas and environmental reasons allow it to be exceptional.

Granite is largely crafted up of quartz crystal, nevertheless it also incorporates many amounts of other metals which include feldspar, mica, copper and iron. Some granite may well incorporate bits of gold or silver. The amount of just about every metal depends about the area it arrives from. All granite is shaped right into a really hard stone by warmth and stress. Rain adds other minerals as it is forming. It truly is obtainable all over the world, in any nation, and every single region will make a surface encounters special number of granite.

Surface Encounters state-of-the-art machinery assures the highest quality completed solution as they style and build several of the finest kitchens and bathrooms. Granite Countertops enhance the warmth and magnificence of residences although growing their price and bettering lifestyles.

Surface Encounters can be worried with worker morale; thrilled personnel are even more probably to contribute on the good results of the small business. Furthermore to currently being a powerful provider and one that could be outstanding to effort for, Surface Encounters does their piece to preserve our planet.

Surface Encounters does what exactly is correct for his or her buyers, staff and the setting. Surface Encounters employs superior h2o recycling capabilities to recycle up to 43,000 gallons of h2o each day. Furthermore, one hundred % in the scrap generated in generating classy kitchens and beautiful baths is re-used as aggregate in street putting together, surface preparations and concrete.

The Columbus, Ohio Grand Opening of Surface Encounters options an art gallery showroom of Granite, Marble, Quartz and Engineered Stone counter tops. Save Supervisor, Scott Donnelly unlocked the doorways in the showroom at 4717 Roberts Road, just west with the I-270 Beltway. The Surface Encounters manufacturing course of action uses precision, automated engineering throughout the fabrication in the customer's personalized counter major, such as: a laser measuring alignment that applications the diamond-tipped sculpturing blades. Surface Encounters' operation consists of computer-driven application that perpetuates the stone's pure veins. Every last Surface Encounter retailer has at the least a person registered, interior designer to help you in generating the completed task you happen to be wanting for. The craftsmanship continues through the

Property owners are choosing to remodel instead than promote their households in today’s market
Granite countertops are becoming a best selection among Wixom shoppers for kitchen remodeling tasks. Kitchen remodeling is often the first venture tackled with families investing 3,000 hrs or even more annually within their kitchen. Granite countertops supply an surroundings that enhances the good quality time spent with relatives and acquaintances. Granite countertops very last a lifetime and develop the high quality of real estate.

Surface Encounters Wixom retail outlet manager, Sal Dellacasa, says there are lots of good reasons shoppers are choosing granite for their countertop requires. “Granite countertops add splendor and elegance to a kitchen. Granite is available inside of a number of vibrant shades and abundant textures and its strength and sturdiness is unmatched by any other natural stone or synthetic countertop substance.”

Surface Encounters’ customers enjoy experienced service as well as a pleasant, very helpful workers to guide them through the kitchen remodeling operation. Several of Surface Encounters new shoppers are referred to them by former clientele.
"This firm is amongst the most affordable, trusted, and friendly firms inside overall state. I'd highly recommend them to everyone." Mike R. Clinton Twp., MI

"The organization has generally been there to assist me in whatsoever way likely. Thank you so much!" David V. Lapeer, MI


Surface Encounters Macomb will be the house of half-off granite for kitchen and bathroom countertops. Granite countertops by Surface Encounters have fast come to be the leading decision for Macomb residents that are remodeling their kitchens. Kitchen remodeling requires priority with families shelling out three,000 hours or more annually in their kitchen. Granite countertops produce an environment that enhances the superior time invested with relatives and mates and improve the good quality of properties.

Surface Encounters Macomb store supervisor, Sal Dellacasa, says there are lots of good reasons buyers are finding granite for his or her countertop requirements. “Granite countertops add attractiveness and elegance to a kitchen. Granite is accessible inside a number of vibrant colours and rich textures and its strength and durability is unmatched by any other surface encounters organic stone or synthetic countertop material.”

Surface Encounters’ buyers get pleasure from certified services in addition to a pleasant, valuable employees to manual them through the kitchen remodeling plan. Many of Surface Encounters new people are referred to them by former customers.

No comments:

Post a Comment